image source: chisnell
I just don’t know why we should take RPK’s Statutory Declaration seriously. RPK look like someone who is “Gila Talak”. If he doesn’t get Pak Lah, he hit KJ, otherwise Najib, since his attempt against Najib going to fail, he tried to “screw” Najib’s wife. Only those “Gila Talak” like RPK will go on and on against UMNO Leaders this way.
RPK did something I waited for a long time, that’s right, doing something really really stupid. Having a sworn SD (Statutory Declaration) on hearsay accounts is stupid, it is not supported by any other evidence. And who is this person who has no “ehem…ehem” who tell all to RPK, of course I would like to know. By knowing this we all know the Statutory Declaration sworn by RPK contain one lie. This no “ehem…ehem…” person could be at the crime scene as well which makes it four and not three as stated by RPK in his Statutory Declaration.
Otherwise how would he know?
“This statement /opinion is limited to correspondences / documents / facts produced before me at time of publication.”
RPK did something I waited for a long time, that’s right, doing something really really stupid. Having a sworn SD (Statutory Declaration) on hearsay accounts is stupid, it is not supported by any other evidence. And who is this person who has no “ehem…ehem” who tell all to RPK, of course I would like to know. By knowing this we all know the Statutory Declaration sworn by RPK contain one lie. This no “ehem…ehem…” person could be at the crime scene as well which makes it four and not three as stated by RPK in his Statutory Declaration.
Otherwise how would he know?
“This statement /opinion is limited to correspondences / documents / facts produced before me at time of publication.”
No comments:
Post a Comment